<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rackspace explains what went wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ciomojo.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=251" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ciomojo.com/?p=251</link>
	<description>A Senior Technology Management community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:09:21 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kretzman</title>
		<link>http://ciomojo.com/?p=251&#038;cpage=1#comment-26281</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kretzman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ciomojo.com/?p=251#comment-26281</guid>
		<description>I left this comment on July 2nd, but it doesn&#039;t seem to have been posted:

Rackspace’s outage explanation is an amazingly (bad) example of jargon-laden, un-customer-oriented IT communication. There’s no discussion of real root cause (um, the breaker tripped, but WHY?) or action plan, just a bunch of technobabble that lets no one understand what really happened, why it happened, and what will ensure that it won’t happen again. It’s kind of like the old joke punchline, “Everything you have told me is technically correct, but it’s no use to anyone.” This inspires negative confidence among one’s customers, needless to say.

I’ve written in my blog about the need (and the ways) to “air the dirty laundry.” See http://www.peterkretzman.com/2008/01/15/why-the-cio-should-air-his-dirty-laundry/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I left this comment on July 2nd, but it doesn&#8217;t seem to have been posted:</p>
<p>Rackspace’s outage explanation is an amazingly (bad) example of jargon-laden, un-customer-oriented IT communication. There’s no discussion of real root cause (um, the breaker tripped, but WHY?) or action plan, just a bunch of technobabble that lets no one understand what really happened, why it happened, and what will ensure that it won’t happen again. It’s kind of like the old joke punchline, “Everything you have told me is technically correct, but it’s no use to anyone.” This inspires negative confidence among one’s customers, needless to say.</p>
<p>I’ve written in my blog about the need (and the ways) to “air the dirty laundry.” See <a href="http://www.peterkretzman.com/2008/01/15/why-the-cio-should-air-his-dirty-laundry/" rel="nofollow">http://www.peterkretzman.com/2008/01/15/why-the-cio-should-air-his-dirty-laundry/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
